Comparing KVM Disk Types: Raw vs QCOW2 vs LVM – Performance, Cloning, Expansion and Migration Guide
2 views
When provisioning KVM virtual machines, choosing the right disk format impacts performance, manageability, and scalability. The three primary options each have distinct characteristics:
Raw format provides direct access to storage without additional abstraction layers.
# Create a 20GB raw image
qemu-img create -f raw vm_disk.raw 20G
When setting up KVM virtual machines, choosing the right disk storage format significantly impacts performance, manageability, and scalability. Let's examine the three primary options with practical examples.
Characteristics:
Direct byte-for-byte representation of disk contents
No overhead from formatting or metadata
# Creating a raw disk image
qemu-img create -f raw vm_disk.raw 20G
Pros:
Best performance (native disk access)
Simple format for direct hardware passthrough
Easily mountable for forensic analysis
Cons:
No snapshot support
Fixed allocation (sparse files possible but less efficient)
Difficult to resize while VM is running
Advanced features:
Copy-on-write for snapshots
Dynamic allocation
Compression and encryption
# Creating a qcow2 image with compression
qemu-img create -f qcow2 -o compression_type=zstd vm_disk.qcow2 20G
# Converting raw to qcow2
qemu-img convert -f raw -O qcow2 vm_disk.raw vm_disk.qcow2
Performance considerations:
~5-10% overhead compared to raw
SSD caching improves performance significantly
Best for development environments needing snapshots
Enterprise-grade solution:
Direct block device access
Thin provisioning support
Advanced volume management
# Creating an LVM volume for KVM
lvcreate -L 20G -n vm_disk vg_kvm
# Using thin provisioning
lvcreate -V 50G -T vg_kvm/thin_pool -n vm_thin_disk
Migration strategy:
# Live migration example using LVM
virsh dumpxml vm1 > vm1.xml
lvcreate --snapshot --name vm1_snap --size 1G vg_kvm/vm_disk
dd if=/dev/vg_kvm/vm1_snap | ssh newhost "dd of=/dev/vg_kvm/vm_disk"
Feature
Raw
QCOW2
LVM
Performance
★★★★★
★★★☆☆
★★★★☆
Snapshot Support
No
Yes
Yes (LVM snapshots)
Live Expansion
Difficult
Easy
Easy (with thin provisioning)
Backup Efficiency
Low (full copy)
Medium (incremental possible)
High (block-level)
For production databases: Use raw or LVM for maximum performance. Example MySQL setup:
For developer workstations: QCOW2 provides the best balance. Enable compression: