When integrating an external domain (e.g., from 1&1) with AWS Elastic Load Balancer, developers face a critical architectural decision:
Current Setup:
- Domain: www.example.com (1&1)
- Infrastructure: AWS Elastic Beanstalk with ELB (example.us-west-2.elasticbeanstalk.com)
The $50/month cost applies only when using Route 53 as your domain registrar. For DNS hosting only:
- $0.50/month per hosted zone (first 25 zones)
- $0.40 per million queries (first 1 billion queries/month)
- No charge for alias records pointing to AWS resources
Option 1: Using Route 53 as DNS Host
# In Route 53 hosted zone for example.com
Record Name Type Value
www A ALIAS dualstack.example-elb.us-west-2.amazonaws.com
@ MX mail.example.com (keeps email routing)
Option 2: External DNS with CNAME
# In 1&1 DNS settings
Record Name Type Value
www CNAME example.us-west-2.elasticbeanstalk.com
The CNAME solution causes these issues:
- Browser URL changes to the ELB endpoint
- SSL certificate must cover both domains
- SEO impact from changing URLs
For production environments:
1. Transfer domain to Route 53 ($12/year + $0.50/month DNS hosting)
2. Create ALIAS record pointing to ELB
3. Configure ACM certificate for www.example.com
4. Attach certificate to ELB listener
Example CloudFormation snippet for Route 53:
Resources:
MyDNSRecord:
Type: AWS::Route53::RecordSet
Properties:
HostedZoneName: example.com.
Name: www.example.com
Type: A
AliasTarget:
HostedZoneId: Z1H1FL5HABSF5
DNSName: dualstack.my-elb-123456.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com
Comparing 1&1 ($10/year) vs Route 53:
Feature | 1&1 | Route 53 |
---|---|---|
DNS Hosting | Free | $6/year |
ALIAS Support | No | Yes |
Integration | CNAME only | Native AWS |
Health Checks | No | Yes |
If keeping domain at 1&1 but using Route 53 DNS:
- Create hosted zone in Route 53
- Update nameservers at 1&1
- Set TTL to 300 seconds before migration
- Create ALIAS record as shown above
When integrating a 1&1-registered domain (e.g., www.example.com) with an AWS Elastic Beanstalk environment, we face two primary technical considerations:
- DNS resolution mechanics (CNAME flattening vs. ALIAS records)
- HTTPS certificate validation requirements
The $50/month fee applies only if you transfer your domain registration to Route 53. For DNS hosting alone:
- Standard queries: $0.40 per million
- Alias queries to AWS resources: Free
- Hosted zone: $0.50/month per zone
With 1&1 DNS management, you might configure:
; 1&1 DNS Configuration
www.example.com. 3600 IN CNAME example.us-west-2.elasticbeanstalk.com.
example.com. 3600 IN A 192.0.2.1 ; Required for root domain
This presents three critical limitations:
- The naked domain (example.com) cannot use CNAME due to RFC restrictions
- Potential MX record conflicts for email services
- No native support for ALIAS records at most registrars
Route 53 solves these issues with:
; Route 53 Configuration
example.com. ALIAS dualstack.example-elb.us-west-2.amazonaws.com.
www.example.com. ALIAS dualstack.example-elb.us-west-2.amazonaws.com.
Key technical benefits:
- Root domain support via ALIAS records
- Automatic IP address resolution (no CNAME chaining)
- Seamless integration with ACM certificates
For budget-conscious deployments:
- Keep domain registration with 1&1 ($10/year)
- Create Route 53 hosted zone ($0.50/month)
- Update 1&1 nameservers to Route 53's NS records
This maintains your registrar while leveraging Route 53's advanced routing for approximately $6/year in additional costs.
When using ACM certificates with 1&1 DNS:
# AWS CLI for certificate validation
aws acm request-certificate \
--domain-name example.com \
--validation-method DNS \
--subject-alternative-names www.example.com
This requires manual CNAME record creation in 1&1's interface for domain validation, whereas Route 53 offers automatic validation.