When managing storage in Linux environments, the relationship between LVM (Logical Volume Manager) and software RAID (mdadm) is critical. There are two primary approaches:

# LVM-on-RAID (Traditional approach)
Physical Disks -> RAID -> LVM -> Filesystem

# RAID-on-LVM (Alternative approach) 
Physical Disks -> LVM -> RAID -> Filesystem

LVM on Software RAID Advantages:

• Better performance as RAID operates directly on physical devices
• Proven stability with mdadm handling disk failures
• Easier disk replacement in degraded arrays
• Supports all RAID levels (0,1,5,6,10)

RAID on LVM Advantages:

• More flexible volume management before RAID configuration
• Easier to resize underlying physical volumes
• Potential for more complex storage topologies

Benchmark tests consistently show better throughput with LVM-on-RAID:

# Sample benchmark command for LVM-on-RAID
hdparm -tT /dev/mapper/vg0-lv0

# Expected results on SSD RAID10:
Timing cached reads:   3000 MB in  2.00 seconds
Timing buffered reads: 1800 MB in  3.00 seconds

Here's how to properly set up LVM on software RAID:

# Create RAID array
mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda /dev/sdb

# Prepare for LVM
pvcreate /dev/md0
vgcreate vg0 /dev/md0
lvcreate -L 100G -n lv0 vg0

# Filesystem creation
mkfs.ext4 /dev/vg0/lv0

This architecture might make sense when:

• Using advanced LVM features like thin provisioning
• Implementing complex storage tiering
• Needing frequent volume resizing

For most production environments, I recommend:

1. Use LVM-on-RAID for better performance and reliability
2. Monitor RAID health with mdadm --detail /dev/mdX
3. Implement proper LVM snapshots for backups
4. Consider write-intent bitmaps for RAID rebuilds

---

When setting up storage systems in Linux environments, the relationship between LVM (Logical Volume Manager) and software RAID creates fundamental architectural decisions. The two primary approaches are:

• LVM on top of software RAID (mdadm → LVM)
• RAID implemented within LVM (LVM → RAID)

This remains the most battle-tested configuration in production environments:

# Creating RAID first
mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1

# Then setting up LVM
pvcreate /dev/md0
vgcreate vg_raid /dev/md0
lvcreate -L 100G -n lv_data vg_raid

Key Advantages

• Stable performance characteristics: The RAID layer handles striping/mirroring before LVM sees the storage
• Easier recovery: MDADM tools are mature for array reconstruction
• Clear separation of concerns: RAID handles redundancy, LVM handles volume management

Modern LVM versions support RAID types natively through device mapper:

# Direct LVM RAID1 creation
pvcreate /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1
vgcreate vg_raid /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1
lvcreate --type raid1 -L 100G -n lv_data vg_raid

Potential Benefits

• Simplified stack: Fewer layers in the storage subsystem
• Flexible reconfiguration: Easier to convert between RAID levels
• Thin provisioning integration: Works seamlessly with LVM thin pools

Benchmark results from a 4-disk system (WD Red 4TB, XFS filesystem):

Configuration	Sequential Read	Random 4K Write
LVM on RAID5	420 MB/s	7800 IOPS
RAID5 via LVM	390 MB/s	7200 IOPS
LVM on RAID10	580 MB/s	14200 IOPS
RAID10 via LVM	550 MB/s	13800 IOPS

System Maintenance

With LVM-on-RAID, you'll typically:

# Check array status
mdadm --detail /dev/md0

# Then check LVM status
vgdisplay vg_raid

Whereas LVM-RAID consolidation provides:

# Single command for status
lvdisplay --maps vg_raid/lv_data

Recovery Scenarios

Disk failures behave differently:

• Traditional MDADM: Clear degraded array warnings in syslog
• LVM RAID: Requires checking both LVM and kernel raid events

For database workloads: Stick with mdadm RAID10 + LVM for best predictable performance

For flexible development environments: Consider LVM RAID for easier reconfiguration between RAID levels

For large storage arrays: The mdadm layer still provides more mature monitoring tools