When working with complex data structures in Ansible, particularly when dealing with nested lists containing duplicate elements, performance can become a significant concern. The common approach using with_subelements
often proves inefficient for large datasets due to its repetitive processing of identical elements.
Consider this typical inventory structure:
my_list:
- { name: foo, settings: ['x', 'y', 'z'] }
- { name: bar, settings: ['x', 'y', 'q', 'w'] }
Using the basic extraction method:
- name: get all settings
set_fact:
all_settings: "{{ my_list|map(attribute='settings')|list }}"
This gives us nested lists rather than the desired flattened, deduplicated result.
To efficiently combine and deduplicate these lists, we can leverage Jinja2's powerful filter chain:
- name: combine and deduplicate settings
set_fact:
unique_settings: "{{ my_list|map(attribute='settings')|flatten|unique|list }}"
Let's break down the filter sequence:
map(attribute='settings')
: Extracts all settings listsflatten
: Combines nested lists into a single listunique
: Removes duplicate elementslist
: Ensures the output is a proper list
This approach significantly outperforms with_subelements
for several reasons:
- Single-pass processing of the entire dataset
- Built-in deduplication during the merge operation
- No repeated processing of duplicate elements
For more complex scenarios where settings might be deeply nested:
- name: handle nested structures
set_fact:
all_settings: "{{ my_list|json_query('[].settings')|flatten|unique|list }}"
If you have the community.general collection installed:
- name: using community.general filters
set_fact:
unique_settings: "{{ my_list|map(attribute='settings')|community.general.lists_mergeby('union') }}"
Verify the output with:
- name: display results
debug:
var: unique_settings
This should output the desired ['x', 'y', 'z', 'q', 'w']
structure.
When working with Ansible inventories containing nested data structures, we often need to extract and combine elements from multiple lists. The challenge intensifies when dealing with large datasets where performance becomes critical, especially when duplicate elements exist that don't require repeated processing.
Given our example inventory:
my_list:
- { name: foo, settings: ['x', 'y', 'z'] }
- { name: bar, settings: ['x', 'y', 'q', 'w'] }
We want to transform this into a single list containing unique elements: ['x', 'y', 'z', 'q', 'w']
.
The straightforward method using map(attribute='settings')
gives us nested lists:
- name: get all settings
set_fact:
all_settings="{{ my_list|map(attribute='settings')|list }}"
This creates the intermediary structure we need to process further.
An efficient way to combine and deduplicate these lists involves using several Jinja2 filters:
- name: combine and deduplicate settings
set_fact:
unique_settings="{{ my_list|map(attribute='settings')|flatten|unique|list }}"
- name: display final result
debug:
var: unique_settings
Let's examine each filter in the solution:
map(attribute='settings')
: Extracts the settings listsflatten
: Combines nested lists into a single listunique
: Removes duplicate elementslist
: Ensures proper list formatting
This approach is significantly more efficient than with_subelements
for several reasons:
- Processes each element only once
- Uses built-in filters optimized for performance
- Minimizes intermediate data structures
For more complex scenarios where you need to maintain element relationships, consider:
- name: advanced list processing
set_fact:
enhanced_result="{{ my_list|json_query('[].settings[]')|unique }}"
This uses JMESPath for more sophisticated querying capabilities.
Always verify your results with test cases:
- name: validate unique settings
assert:
that:
- "'x' in unique_settings"
- "'w' in unique_settings"
- "unique_settings|length == 5"
This technique is particularly useful when:
- Generating configuration files from multiple sources
- Creating consolidated reports from inventory data
- Preparing input for other tasks that require unique values