How NS Record TTL Affects Other DNS Records: A Deep Dive into DNS Caching Behavior


2 views

In DNS resolution, there's a clear hierarchy of operations that occurs:

; Example DNS zone file snippet
$TTL 14400
example.com.    IN  NS    ns1.example.com.
example.com.    IN  NS    ns2.example.com.
test.example.com. IN A    192.0.2.1

The NS record TTL and other record TTLs operate independently in the caching process. When a resolver looks up test.example.com, it goes through these steps:

  1. Checks cache for test.example.com A record
  2. If not found, checks cache for example.com NS records
  3. If NS records aren't cached, performs recursive lookup

The key thing to understand is that NS record TTL governs how long resolvers will cache the name server information, while the A record TTL governs how long the actual IP address is cached. These are separate cache entries with independent timers.

Consider this real-world example:

; Zone file with different TTLs
example.com.    3600  IN  NS  ns1.example.com.
example.com.    3600  IN  NS  ns2.example.com.
www             86400 IN  A   203.0.113.45

In this case, resolvers will:

  • Cache the NS records for 1 hour (3600 seconds)
  • Cache the www.example.com A record for 24 hours (86400 seconds)

There is one scenario where NS record TTL affects other records: when the NS records themselves change. If you lower the NS TTL before changing name servers, it helps propagate the change faster.

For example, when migrating DNS providers:

; Before migration (1 week prior)
$TTL 86400
example.com.    IN  NS    old1.provider.com.
example.com.    IN  NS    old2.provider.com.

; During migration (lower TTL)
$TTL 3600
example.com.    IN  NS    new1.provider.com.
example.com.    IN  NS    new2.provider.com.

For optimal DNS performance and flexibility:

  1. Set NS record TTLs between 1-24 hours (3600-86400 seconds)
  2. Use higher TTLs for stable records (A, CNAME)
  3. Lower TTLs temporarily before making DNS changes
  4. Remember that some ISPs ignore TTLs below certain thresholds

The most important takeaway is that NS record TTL doesn't override other record TTLs - they're cached independently. However, they do control how quickly DNS changes can propagate through the system.

The TTL (Time To Live) value on NS records does not automatically lower or override the TTL of other resource records in the zone. Each DNS record maintains its own independent TTL value, and these values are cached separately by resolvers.

Consider this example zone file:

example.com.     3600  IN  NS  ns1.example.com.
example.com.     3600  IN  NS  ns2.example.com.
test.example.com. 14400 IN  A   192.0.2.1

In this case:

  • NS records have 3600s (1h) TTL
  • A record has 14400s (4h) TTL

When a resolver queries for test.example.com:

  1. It caches the NS records (if not already cached) for 3600s
  2. It caches the A record response for 14400s
  3. These cached values expire independently of each other

For optimal DNS performance:

; Recommended setup for production:
example.com.     86400  IN  NS  ns1.example.com.  ; 24h TTL for stable NS
www.example.com. 300    IN  A   192.0.2.1         ; 5m TTL for flexible changes

The only scenario where NS record TTL affects other records is during zone delegation changes. When you update NS records at the parent zone (e.g., .com registry), the old TTL determines how long old nameservers may still receive queries.

You can confirm this behavior experimentally:

# Query NS records
dig +nocmd +nocomments +noquestion NS example.com

# Query A record separately
dig +nocmd +nocomments +noquestion A test.example.com

Compare the TTL values in the responses to see they maintain their independent values.

  • Set longer TTLs (24h+) for NS and MX records
  • Use shorter TTLs (5m-1h) for records that change frequently
  • Plan TTL reductions before major DNS changes