When running sudo lsof /tmp/incoming_data.txt
on a busy server, the two-minute execution time isn't just an inconvenience - it's a symptom of deeper system interaction issues. The ext3 filesystem's metadata handling combined with lsof's default behavior creates this perfect storm of inefficiency.
# Typical output showing the bottleneck $ time sudo lsof /tmp/incoming_data.txt COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME python3 30425 root 3r REG 253,0 14372341 393217 /tmp/incoming_data.txt real 2m15.43s user 0m12.11s sys 1m58.27s
For targeted file access checks, consider these lower-overhead approaches:
# Option 1: Using /proc directly (fastest) find /proc/[0-9]*/fd -ls 2>/dev/null | grep "/tmp/incoming_data.txt" # Option 2: Kernel inotify monitoring (persistent solution) inotifywait -m /tmp -e open | grep incoming_data.txt # Option 3: eBPF-based tracing (modern kernels) sudo bpftrace -e 'tracepoint:syscalls:sys_enter_openat { if (str(args->filename) == "/tmp/incoming_data.txt") { printf("%s[%d] opened %s\\n", comm, pid, str(args->filename)); } }'
For ext3 filesystems, these kernel parameters can help:
# Reduce inode cache pressure echo 50 > /proc/sys/vm/vfs_cache_pressure # Increase dentry cache size echo 100000 > /proc/sys/fs/file-max
If you absolutely need lsof functionality, these flags improve performance:
# Skip network files and restrict to local FS sudo lsof -b -w -n /tmp/incoming_data.txt # Analyze only specific process types sudo lsof -c python -c java -c ruby /tmp/incoming_data.txt
For persistent monitoring needs, consider implementing a dedicated file access service using these components:
# Sample Go watcher using fanotify package main import ( "golang.org/x/sys/unix" "log" ) func main() { fd, err := unix.FanotifyInit(unix.FAN_CLOEXEC|unix.FAN_CLASS_CONTENT, unix.O_RDONLY|unix.O_LARGEFILE) if err != nil { log.Fatal(err) } err = unix.FanotifyMark(fd, unix.FAN_MARK_ADD|unix.FAN_MARK_MOUNT, unix.FAN_OPEN_PERM, unix.AT_FDCWD, "/tmp") if err != nil { log.Fatal(err) } // Event processing loop would go here }
When running sudo lsof /tmp/incoming_data.txt
on my production server with heavy TCP traffic, I noticed two concerning behaviors:
- Execution time exceeding 2 minutes
- Consistent 99% CPU utilization during operation
Traditional alternatives like fuser
showed similar performance characteristics. This suggests a systemic issue with how Linux handles file descriptor enumeration under heavy loads.
The root cause lies in how lsof gathers information:
1. Traverses /proc filesystem for all processes
2. Parses network socket information
3. Cross-references file descriptors
4. Filters results against your path argument
On servers with thousands of TCP connections (common in web servers, databases, etc.), steps 2 and 3 become particularly expensive.
Option 1: Targeted /proc Inspection
find /proc/[0-9]*/fd -ls 2>/dev/null | grep '/tmp/incoming_data.txt'
This skips network socket overhead by directly checking file descriptors.
Option 2: Kernel inotify Monitoring
#!/bin/bash
inotifywait -m /tmp -e open |
while read path action file; do
if [[ "$file" == "incoming_data.txt" ]]; then
echo "File opened at $(date)"
fi
done
Option 3: lsof With Network Filtering
lsof -n -i4,6 -F n 2>/dev/null >/dev/null &
lsof /tmp/incoming_data.txt
Method | Execution Time | CPU Usage |
---|---|---|
Standard lsof | 120s | 99% |
/proc inspection | 0.8s | 15% |
inotify setup | 0.1s (initial) | <1% |
For monitoring scenarios:
- Use
auditd
rules for security-conscious environments - Implement eBPF tracing for low-overhead monitoring
- Consider FUSE-based solutions for specialized cases