When working with VPN connections (particularly SSL VPNs like FortiClient), throughput reduction is expected due to:
- Encryption/decryption overhead
- Protocol encapsulation
- Additional routing hops
- Potential MTU size mismatches
While the 55% reduction claim might seem high, it's not unrealistic in certain scenarios. Here's how to properly measure:
# Python script to test transfer speeds
import speedtest
import time
def vpn_speed_test():
st = speedtest.Speedtest()
print("Testing without VPN...")
start = time.time()
download_no_vpn = st.download() / 1_000_000 # Convert to Mbps
elapsed_no_vpn = time.time() - start
# Connect to VPN here (manual step)
input("Connect VPN and press Enter...")
print("Testing with VPN...")
start = time.time()
download_with_vpn = st.download() / 1_000_000
elapsed_with_vpn = time.time() - start
reduction = ((download_no_vpn - download_with_vpn) / download_no_vpn) * 100
print(f"Throughput reduction: {reduction:.2f}%")
vpn_speed_test()
BandwidthPlace tests often measure short bursts rather than sustained transfers. For file operations, consider:
# Linux: Test sustained transfer with dd over network
dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=512 | nc -v work_server 9999
# Windows alternative using PowerShell:
Measure-Command {
Get-Content largefile.bin | Out-File \\vpn_mapped_drive\path\testfile.bin
} | Select-Object TotalSeconds
Try these registry tweaks (Windows):
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\FortiSslvpn\Parameters]
"TcpTuning"=dword:00000001
"TcpWindowSize"=dword:00080000
"MtuDiscover"=dword:00000001
Run these commands during your transfer:
# Continuous ping to detect latency spikes
ping -t work_server
# Path analysis
tracert work_server
# Check for packet fragmentation
netsh interface ipv4 show subinterfaces
At such extreme slowdowns, investigate:
- VPN tunnel mode (DTLS vs TLS)
- Split tunneling configuration
- Corporate traffic shaping policies
- Potential ISP throttling
When troubleshooting slow file transfers (5KB/s upload) through FortiClient SSL VPN, I encountered conflicting information about expected throughput reduction. Network administrators often cite a 55% performance penalty as standard, but real-world testing tells a different story.
Running speed tests before/after VPN connection showed negligible difference, which contradicts the admin's claim. This reveals an important insight about VPN testing methodology:
# Sample network test script (Python)
import speedtest
import time
def run_vpn_benchmark():
st = speedtest.Speedtest()
print("Testing raw connection...")
pre_vpn = st.download()/1024/1024 # Convert to Mbps
# Simulate VPN connection
connect_to_vpn()
time.sleep(10) # Allow tunnel stabilization
print("Testing VPN throughput...")
post_vpn = st.download()/1024/1024
print(f"Throughput reduction: {((pre_vpn-post_vpn)/pre_vpn)*100:.2f}%")
Forticlient SSL VPN introduces several layers that impact throughput:
- Encryption overhead (AES-256 typically adds 15-20% overhead)
- Tunnel MTU size reduction (often 1400 bytes vs standard 1500)
- TCP-over-TCP problems (especially for large file transfers)
For extreme cases like 5KB/s transfers:
# Troubleshooting steps (Bash commands)
# 1. Check baseline latency:
ping -c 10 corporate-server.com
# 2. Test raw TCP throughput without VPN:
iperf3 -c corporate-server.com -p 5201
# 3. Test through VPN tunnel:
iperf3 -c vpn.corporate-server.com -p 5201
For file transfers, consider these adjustments:
# SFTP configuration for better VPN performance
Host corporate-vpn
HostName vpn.corporate.com
User employee
ServerAliveInterval 60
TCPKeepAlive yes
Compression no
Ciphers aes128-ctr
MACs hmac-sha1
When VPN throughput remains unacceptable:
// Node.js example for chunked file transfer
const fs = require('fs');
const { exec } = require('child_process');
function chunkedUpload(filePath, chunkSize = 102400) {
const stream = fs.createReadStream(filePath, { highWaterMark: chunkSize });
stream.on('data', (chunk) => {
exec(curl -T - https://vpn-server/upload --data-binary @-,
{ input: chunk.toString('base64') });
});
}