When dealing with HP ProCurve 2920 switches in a 2-node deployment for VoIP environments, the stacking architecture becomes critical. The stacking modules (J9730A for 2920 series) create a 20Gbps backplane connection between switches, which is significantly faster than standard trunked ports.
While the stacking solution adds approximately $1,800 to the project cost (modules + cables), consider these technical advantages:
- Single management interface (one IP address for both switches)
- Unified configuration and firmware management
- Automatic failover capabilities
- True stack synchronization (MAC tables, ARP, etc.)
For your specific 2-switch scenario, these are the practical configurations:
Option 1: Ring Topology (Recommended)
Switch1 StackPort1 <---> Switch2 StackPort2
Switch1 StackPort2 <---> Switch2 StackPort1
This provides full redundancy. If one stacking cable fails, communication continues through the alternate path.
Option 2: Chain Topology
Switch1 StackPort1 <---> Switch2 StackPort1
Simpler cabling but creates a single point of failure. Not recommended for production environments.
Option 3: Traditional Trunking
Switch1 Gig1/1 <---> Switch2 Gig1/1
Switch1 Gig1/2 <---> Switch2 Gig1/2
Configure as LACP trunk (example config):
interface GigabitEthernet 1/1
channel-group 1 mode active
!
interface GigabitEthernet 1/2
channel-group 1 mode active
!
interface Port-channel 1
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100,200
switchport mode trunk
With your traffic profile (100Mbps PC+phone combos), even a 2Gbps trunk would be sufficient bandwidth-wise. However, stacking provides:
- Lower latency between switches (backplane vs. network hops)
- Better QoS handling for voice traffic
- Simpler troubleshooting (single logical device)
For this VoIP deployment with no planned expansion, I recommend:
- Invest in the stacking modules if budget allows - the operational benefits outweigh the cost
- Implement a full ring topology using both stacking ports
- If budget is constrained, implement a 4-port LACP trunk (requires 4 free ports)
When deploying two HP ProCurve 2920-48G PoE switches in a VoIP environment, the fundamental question revolves around whether to invest in dedicated stacking modules or utilize standard trunking between switch ports. Let's break down the technical considerations:
// Pseudo-code for topology decision logic
if (budget_available && management_simplicity_needed) {
implement_stacking();
} else if (redundancy_critical && bandwidth_requirements_high) {
implement_dual_trunk();
} else {
implement_single_trunk();
}
The stacking modules (J9732A) provide 20Gbps full-duplex bandwidth between switches through the dedicated stacking ports. For a two-switch deployment:
- Single-cable chain topology creates 20Gbps throughput but no redundancy
- Dual-cable ring topology provides 40Gbps aggregate bandwidth with failover capability
# Stacking configuration example
configure terminal
stacking
member 1 type J9729A
member 2 type J9729A
ports 1/1,2/1 enable
exit
Using regular Gigabit ports for trunking offers a cost-effective solution. A 4-port LACP trunk provides:
- 4Gbps full-duplex bandwidth (sufficient for 100Mbps phone+PC combos)
- Built-in redundancy through LACP failover
- No additional hardware costs
// Trunk configuration example (HP ProCurve CLI)
configure terminal
trunk A1-A4 trk1 lacp
vlan 1
untagged trk1
exit
Metric | Stacking (Dual-cable) | 4-port LACP Trunk |
---|---|---|
Bandwidth | 40Gbps | 4Gbps |
Failover Time | <1s | 1-3s |
Cost | $1800+ | $0 |
For a call center with 48 phones per switch (96 total), let's examine traffic patterns:
- G.711 codec uses ~100kbps per call
- Simultaneous calls during peak: 30 per switch
- Total voice bandwidth: 3Mbps per switch
- PC traffic (behind phones): ~1Mbps average
Even during peak usage, a 4-port trunk provides sufficient headroom (4Gbps vs. ~8Mbps actual load).
If opting for trunking instead of stacking:
- Use non-adjacent ports to minimize ASIC load
- Enable spanning-tree portfast on phone ports
- Configure QoS to prioritize voice traffic
# QoS configuration example
configure terminal
vlan 1
voice
exit
qos
priority high 10
exit
For this specific dual-switch VoIP deployment with limited port utilization and no growth plans, standard trunking between switches provides the most cost-effective solution while meeting all performance requirements. The $1800+ savings from skipping stacking modules could be better invested in UPS backup or network monitoring tools.