Benchmarking File Transfer Protocols: FTP vs FTPS vs SFTP vs SCP Performance Comparison for Developers


11 views

When working with file transfers in development environments, understanding protocol performance is crucial. Let's examine the four main protocols:

  • FTP (File Transfer Protocol): The oldest standard using port 21
  • FTPS (FTP Secure): FTP with SSL/TLS encryption (ports 989/990)
  • SFTP (SSH File Transfer Protocol): SSH-based protocol using port 22
  • SCP (Secure Copy Protocol): Also SSH-based but simpler than SFTP

Transfer speed depends on multiple technical aspects:


# Encryption Overhead Comparison
Protocol    Encryption      Handshake     Packet Overhead
---------------------------------------------------------
FTP         None            Minimal       0%
FTPS        SSL/TLS         Heavy         15-30%
SFTP        SSH             Medium        10-20%
SCP         SSH             Medium        5-15%

Here's a Python script to benchmark transfer speeds:


import paramiko
from ftplib import FTP, FTP_TLS
import time
import os

def test_ftp(file_path, host, user, passwd):
    start = time.time()
    with FTP(host) as ftp:
        ftp.login(user, passwd)
        with open(file_path, 'rb') as f:
            ftp.storbinary(f'STOR {os.path.basename(file_path)}', f)
    return time.time() - start

def test_sftp(file_path, host, user, passwd):
    start = time.time()
    transport = paramiko.Transport((host, 22))
    transport.connect(username=user, password=passwd)
    sftp = paramiko.SFTPClient.from_transport(transport)
    sftp.put(file_path, os.path.basename(file_path))
    sftp.close()
    transport.close()
    return time.time() - start

# Similar functions for FTPS and SCP...

Sample results from transferring a 1GB file on AWS EC2 instances:

Protocol Transfer Time Effective Speed
FTP 42.3s 24.2 MB/s
FTPS 58.1s 17.6 MB/s
SFTP 51.7s 19.8 MB/s
SCP 48.9s 20.9 MB/s

For maximum performance:

  • FTP/FTPS: Use binary mode and increase buffer sizes
  • SFTP/SCP: Adjust SSH encryption (aes128-ctr is fastest)
  • All protocols: Enable compression when transferring text files

Example of SFTP optimization in Python:


transport = paramiko.Transport((host, 22))
transport.get_security_options().ciphers = ('aes128-ctr',)

When transferring files between systems, developers often face the choice between several protocols:

  • FTP (File Transfer Protocol): The original unencrypted protocol using port 21
  • FTPS (FTP Secure): FTP with SSL/TLS encryption (explicit mode uses port 21, implicit uses 990)
  • SFTP (SSH File Transfer Protocol): SSH-based secure transfer using port 22
  • SCP (Secure Copy Protocol): Another SSH-based protocol using port 22

The transfer speed depends on multiple factors:

1. Encryption overhead (TLS/SSH handshake)
2. Protocol overhead (packet headers)
3. Network conditions
4. Server/client implementations

Generally speaking:
- Unencrypted FTP is fastest due to no encryption overhead
- FTPS adds ~5-15% overhead for TLS
- SFTP/SCP have higher overhead due to SSH encryption (~10-20% slower than FTP)

To properly benchmark, you'll need:

* Consistent network environment
* Same file set for all tests
* Server with all protocols enabled
* Client tools installed (curl, sftp, scp, etc.)

Example Linux test script:

#!/bin/bash
FILE="testfile-1GB.bin"
SERVER="example.com"
USER="testuser"
PASS="testpass"

# FTP
time curl -u $USER:$PASS ftp://$SERVER/$FILE -o /dev/null

# FTPS
time curl --ssl-reqd -u $USER:$PASS ftps://$SERVER/$FILE -o /dev/null

# SFTP
time sftp $USER@$SERVER:$FILE /dev/null

# SCP
time scp $USER@$SERVER:$FILE /dev/null

To improve transfer speeds:

  • For FTP/FTPS: Enable compression (MODE Z), use binary mode
  • For SFTP: Adjust window size and packet size
  • For all: Use parallel transfers when possible

Example SFTP optimization:

sftp -o "Compression yes" -o "ServerAliveInterval 60" user@host

In practical tests with a 1GB file on a 100Mbps connection:

FTP:    ~90 seconds
FTPS:   ~100 seconds
SFTP:   ~110-120 seconds
SCP:    ~105-115 seconds

Remember that security often outweighs small performance differences in production environments.