html
When you requested explicit A records for three subdomains (sub1.example.com
, sub2.example.com
, sub3.example.com
) but received a wildcard record (*.example.com
), your host essentially implemented this DNS configuration:
; Zone file snippet example.com. IN A 192.0.2.1 *.example.com. IN A 192.0.2.1
While functionally equivalent for your stated needs, this approach creates several technical considerations.
1. Phishing Vulnerabilities:
Attackers could register login.example.com
or admin.example.com
and host phishing pages that appear legitimate.
2. Cookie Scope Issues:
Modern browsers implement same-site cookies, but wildcards can still cause problems with:
Set-Cookie: session=abc123; Domain=.example.com; Path=/; Secure
Search engines may index multiple variations of your content under different subdomains:
random123.example.com/about
foo.example.com/about
This can trigger Google's duplicate content penalties despite canonical tags.
1. Debugging Challenges:
Wildcards make it harder to diagnose DNS-related issues in development environments:
# Troubleshooting becomes ambiguous when curl -v http://test.example.com # and curl -v http://dev.example.com # resolve identically
2. Certificate Complications:
Wildcard SSL certificates require careful handling in CI/CD pipelines:
# Let's Encrypt wildcard cert example certbot certonly \ --manual \ --preferred-challenges=dns \ -d *.example.com \ -d example.com
Request your host replace the wildcard with explicit records:
; Correct zone file implementation example.com. IN A 192.0.2.1 sub1.example.com. IN A 192.0.2.1 sub2.example.com. IN A 192.0.2.1 sub3.example.com. IN A 192.0.2.1
Wildcards become appropriate when:
- Running multi-tenant SaaS platforms
- Developing dynamic staging environments
- Implementing domain-based routing for microservices
# Kubernetes Ingress example using wildcards apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: Ingress metadata: name: wildcard-ingress spec: rules: - host: "*.example.com" http: paths: - path: / pathType: Prefix backend: service: name: main-service port: number: 80
When your hosting provider implements a wildcard DNS record (*.yourdomain.tld) instead of specific A records as requested, it creates both technical and security considerations that developers should evaluate carefully.
Here's what typically happens in DNS configuration:
# What you requested (specific A records)
sub1.yourdomain.tld. IN A 192.0.2.1
sub2.yourdomain.tld. IN A 192.0.2.1
sub3.yourdomain.tld. IN A 192.0.2.1
# What you got (wildcard record)
*.yourdomain.tld. IN A 192.0.2.1
The wildcard approach introduces several security considerations:
- Potential for phishing attacks using arbitrary subdomains
- Cookie scope vulnerabilities (domain=.yourdomain.tld)
- Unexpected CORS behavior
- SSL certificate complications when using wildcard certs
Search engines may index random subdomains created by third parties, potentially leading to:
- Duplicate content issues
- Negative SEO attacks
- Brand reputation damage from malicious subdomains
For most production environments, explicit DNS records are preferable. Here's how to implement proper controls:
# Recommended approach (Nginx example)
server {
listen 80;
server_name sub1.yourdomain.tld sub2.yourdomain.tld sub3.yourdomain.tld;
# Block all other subdomains
if ($host !~* ^(sub1|sub2|sub3)\.yourdomain\.tld$) {
return 444;
}
# Your normal configuration
...
}
Wildcard DNS can be appropriate for:
- Development/staging environments
- SaaS platforms with customer-specific subdomains
- Legacy systems requiring dynamic subdomains
Use DNS lookup tools to verify your configuration:
# Command line verification
dig +short randomsub.yourdomain.tld
dig +short sub1.yourdomain.tld
For strict enforcement, consider implementing these measures:
# Web server configuration (Apache example)
<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerName yourdomain.tld
ServerAlias *.yourdomain.tld
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(sub1|sub2|sub3)\.yourdomain\.tld$
RewriteRule ^ - [F]
</VirtualHost>