When managing a network of ~30 workstations with 2 terminal servers (production + standby), the AD question becomes particularly nuanced. Many sysadmins assume AD is mandatory, but let's examine real technical tradeoffs.
# Example PowerShell for manual user management
New-LocalUser -Name "jsmith" -Password (ConvertTo-SecureString "P@ssw0rd" -AsPlainText -Force)
Add-LocalGroupMember -Group "Remote Desktop Users" -Member "jsmith"
Without AD, you're manually handling:
- Centralized authentication (each machine maintains separate credentials)
- Group Policy management (replaced by manual registry edits or local policies)
- Security auditing (no unified event logs)
- Software deployment (manual installs or third-party tools)
Your terminal servers running independent corporate apps change the calculus. Consider this RDS configuration alternative:
# Sample RDS deployment without AD
Install-WindowsFeature RDS-RD-Server -IncludeManagementTools
Set-ItemProperty -Path "HKLM:\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server" -Name "fSingleSessionPerUser" -Value 0
For shops resisting AD, evaluate:
- Azure AD Hybrid (cloud-managed identities)
- JumpCloud (directory-as-service)
- Samba4 (AD-compatible open source)
Operation | With AD | Without AD |
---|---|---|
User provisioning | 15s (PowerShell) | 5min/machine |
Policy enforcement | Instant (GPO) | Manual (30min+) |
Security patches | WSUS automated | Manual/3rd party |
Deploy AD if:
- Your corporate app integrates with LDAP/Kerberos
- You anticipate growth beyond 50 devices
- Compliance requires centralized auditing
An AD server adds ~4 hours/month maintenance:
- Patch Tuesday updates
- DNS/DHCP management
- Backup verification
But eliminates 10+ hours of manual user management.
When managing a network with ~30 endpoints and 2 terminal servers (production/standby), the AD deployment question becomes particularly nuanced. The core trade-off centers around administrative efficiency versus infrastructure complexity.
// Without AD (Manual approach)
foreach (Workstation ws in network) {
ws.ConfigureFirewallRules();
ws.DeploySoftwareUpdates();
ws.ManageLocalUsers();
}
// With AD (Centralized management)
DomainController.ApplyGroupPolicy(
target: "AllWorkstations",
policies: [FirewallConfig, UpdateSchedule, AuthSettings]
);
Real-world operational impacts:
- User provisioning time drops from 15-30 minutes per machine to 2 minutes domain-wide
- Security patches deploy simultaneously via WSUS instead of manual RDP sessions
- Terminal Server CAL management becomes automatic rather than per-device tracking
For your specific case, consider a single Server Core installation with these essential roles:
# PowerShell deployment snippet
Install-WindowsFeature -Name AD-Domain-Services -IncludeManagementTools
Install-ADDSDomainController -InstallDns -DomainName "corp.example.com"
Set-ADDefaultDomainPasswordPolicy -Identity "corp.example.com" -ComplexityEnabled $true
Even with standalone terminal servers, AD provides value:
# RD Gateway configuration with AD integration
New-RDSessionDeployment -ConnectionBroker "TS01.corp.example.com" -WebAccessServer "TS01.corp.example.com"
Set-RDClientAccessLicense -Mode "PerUser" -ConnectionBroker "TS01.corp.example.com"
Some shops achieve stability through alternative stacks:
# Example Ansible playbook for AD-less management
- hosts: workstations
tasks:
- name: Enforce local admin restrictions
win_user_right:
name: SeInteractiveLogonRight
users: "BUILTIN\\Administrators"
action: remove
Consider AD when:
Factor | Threshold |
---|---|
Simultaneous changes needed | >5 machines at once |
Staff turnover rate | >2 users/month |
Compliance requirements | HIPAA/PCI applies |