Nagios vs Monit: Detailed Feature Comparison for System Monitoring in DevOps Environments


2 views

While both Nagios and Monit serve monitoring purposes, their architectures reveal fundamental differences:


# Nagios typical configuration example
define host {
    host_name    web_server
    alias        Main Web Server
    address      192.168.1.100
    check_command check-host-alive
    max_check_attempts 5
}

# Monit equivalent configuration
check host web_server with address 192.168.1.100
    if failed ping then alert

Nagios provides sophisticated notification handling:


define service {
    host_name             web_server
    service_description   HTTP
    check_command         check_http
    notification_interval 60
    notification_options  w,u,c,r
    contact_groups        admins
}



Monit's approach is more streamlined:



check process nginx with pidfile /var/run/nginx.pid
    start program = "/etc/init.d/nginx start"
    stop program = "/etc/init.d/nginx stop"
    if failed port 80 protocol http then alert
    if 5 restarts within 5 cycles then timeout



Nagios shines with its extensive plugin library (over 3000 official plugins):



# Checking MySQL replication status with Nagios
./check_mysql_replication -H db-slave -u monitor -p secret \
--master-host=db-master --critical=60 --warning=30



Monit relies more on built-in capabilities and simple scripting:



check program myscript with path "/usr/local/bin/check_mysql.sh"
    if status != 0 then alert



Nagios excels at distributed monitoring scenarios:



# NRPE configuration for remote checks
command[check_disk]=/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_disk -w 20% -c 10%



Monit is better suited for local resource monitoring:



check system myserver
    if loadavg (1min) > 4 then alert
    if memory usage > 75% then alert
    if cpu usage (user) > 80% for 5 cycles then alert



Consider Nagios when you need:


    

  • Enterprise-scale monitoring with hundreds of nodes
    • 

  • Complex notification workflows
    • 

  • Integration with other IT management systems
    • 



Monit works better for:


    

  • Single-server or small cluster monitoring
    • 

  • Automated recovery actions
    • 

  • Lightweight resource monitoring
    • 





Nagios follows a centralized polling architecture where the server actively checks services at intervals, while Monit employs a decentralized approach with autonomous agents monitoring local resources. This impacts their capabilities in modern distributed systems:


# Nagios service check example
define service {
    host_name               web-server
    service_description     HTTP
    check_command           check_http
    max_check_attempts      3
    check_interval          5
    retry_interval          1
}

# Monit configuration example
check process nginx with pidfile /var/run/nginx.pid
    start program = "/etc/init.d/nginx start"
    stop program = "/etc/init.d/nginx stop"
    if failed port 80 protocol http then restart
    if 3 restarts within 5 cycles then timeout



    

  • Scalability: Cluster-aware checks with Nagios XI can monitor 100,000+ nodes
    • 

  • Reporting: SLA compliance tracking with historical data retention
    • 

  • Visualization: Geomaps and business process views unavailable in Monit
    • 

  • API Integration: REST API for CMDB integration and ticketing systems
    • 



The autonomous recovery capability makes Monit ideal for:


# Automated certificate renewal handling
check file ssl_cert with path /etc/ssl/certs/website.pem
    if changed checksum then exec "/usr/bin/renew_ssl.sh"
    alert admin@example.com on { checksum } with reminder on 5 cycles






Metric
Nagios
Monit




CPU Overhead
High (polling)
Low (event-based)




Network Traffic
O(n) to hosts
O(1) local only




Alert Latency
Check interval dependent
Sub-second





Many organizations use Monit for host-level resilience combined with Nagios for centralized visibility:


# Nagios NRPE check calling Monit status
command[check_monit]=/usr/bin/monit status | grep -q "Running" || exit 2



Nagios boasts 5,000+ community plugins versus Monit's limited extension mechanism. However, Monit's integration with systemd offers modern advantages:


# Monit + systemd example
check process app_service matching "systemd --user --unit=app"
    if not exist for 3 cycles then exec "/usr/bin/systemctl --user restart app"