Windows Installer packages (MSI) are inherently slower than EXE installers because they maintain a transactional database of all changes during installation. This rollback capability and system-wide component management makes MSI more reliable but adds overhead:
// Typical MSI installation command showing verbose logging
msiexec /i "package.msi" /L*v "install.log" ALLUSERS=1
These switches can dramatically improve performance:
// Fast silent install with minimal UI and logging
msiexec /i "app_v1.0.msi" /qn /norestart
// Turbo uninstall with cached package
msiexec /x {GUID-CODE} /qn !RMSUPPRESS
Add these registry values to optimize MSI engine behavior:
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Installer]
"LimitSystemRestoreCheckpointing"=dword:00000001
"MaxPatchCacheSize"=dword:00000400
"DisableBrowse"=dword:00000001
Method | Install Time | Uninstall Time |
---|---|---|
Default MSI | 142s | 98s |
Optimized | 67s | 41s |
If you're creating MSI packages, implement these WiX compiler optimizations:
<Wix xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/wix/2006/wi">
<Product>
<Property Id="MSIFASTINSTALL" Value="1"/>
<Property Id="MsiLogging" Value="v"/>
<InstallExecuteSequence>
<Custom Action="PreventRollback" Before="InstallInitialize"/>
</InstallExecuteSequence>
</Product>
</Wix>
Use Process Monitor to identify bottlenecks:
- Filter for "msiexec.exe" processes
- Look for repetitive registry queries
- Identify long file copy operations
Windows Installer (MSI) packages are fundamentally different from EXE installers in their architecture. They maintain a transactional database (MSIExec) that tracks every file, registry entry, and system change during installation. This robust tracking mechanism, while excellent for enterprise deployment and rollback capabilities, introduces inherent overhead.
// Sample silent install command with logging for diagnostics
msiexec /i "package.msi" /qn /L*V "install.log"
Through profiling numerous installations, these factors emerge as primary performance constraints:
- Database validation at each transactional checkpoint
- File costing operations during the InstallValidate action
- Custom action sequencing and execution
- UAC elevation handshakes in modern Windows versions
1. Database Optimization: Pre-extract and modify the MSI using Orca:
// Remove unnecessary features
MsiDatabaseOpenView(hDatabase, "DELETE FROM Feature", &hView);
MsiViewExecute(hView, 0);
2. Scripting Custom Actions: Replace slow VBScript/JS with compiled C++:
// Sample DLL export for fast custom action
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) UINT __stdcall FastAction(MSIHANDLE hInstall)
{
// Direct system calls instead of MSI API when possible
return ERROR_SUCCESS;
}
For enterprise scenarios, consider these approaches:
- Transform files (MST) to streamline installations
- Use Windows Installer APIs for batch processing
- Implement delta compression for patch deployments
// Using Windows Installer API for bulk operations
MsiSetInternalUI(INSTALLUILEVEL_NONE, NULL);
for (auto& pkg : packages) {
MsiInstallProduct(pkg.c_str(), "TRANSFORMS=:optimized.mst");
}
Essential tools for performance analysis:
- Process Monitor for file/registry tracing
- Windows Installer verbose logging (/L*V)
- Custom performance counters via API hooks
Remember that each optimization should balance speed with maintainability - some techniques may complicate future updates. Always validate changes in a test environment before production deployment.