PV vs HVM Virtualization in AWS EC2: Key Technical Differences for Linux Instance Performance Optimization


3 views

When provisioning Ubuntu Linux instances on AWS EC2, engineers face a fundamental architectural choice between two virtualization paradigms:

// Example showing instance launch parameters
aws ec2 run-instances \
    --image-id ami-0abcdef1234567890 \
    --instance-type t2.micro \
    --virtualization-type hvm  # or "paravirtual"

HVM provides complete hardware abstraction through:

  • Full virtualization of CPU instructions (Intel VT-x/AMD-V)
  • Hardware-assisted memory management (EPT/NPT)
  • Native device drivers via virtio

The boot process in HVM:

1. BIOS/UEFI firmware initialization
2. GRUB2 bootloader execution
3. Linux kernel launch with HVM-specific modules
4. Virtio drivers initialization

PV operates through hypercalls rather than hardware emulation:

  • Modified kernel with hypervisor awareness
  • Frontend/backend driver architecture
  • Shared memory rings for I/O

Performance-critical sectors where PV excels:

# Disk I/O benchmark comparison
pv: 4500 IOPS (avg)
hvm: 3800 IOPS (avg)

Critical factors for choosing in 2023:

Feature HVM PV
NVMe Support Yes No
ENA Networking Yes Limited

Converting PV AMI to HVM:

# Using AWS CLI tools
aws ec2 modify-image-attribute \
    --image-id ami-0oldpvimage \
    --virtualization-type hvm

When launching Ubuntu Linux instances on AWS EC2, you'll encounter two virtualization types:

  • PV (Paravirtual): Uses modified OS kernels that communicate directly with hypervisor through hypercalls
  • HVM (Hardware Virtual Machine): Provides full hardware virtualization with unmodified OS kernels

The fundamental architectural differences can be visualized:


# PV Architecture
Host Hardware → Hypervisor → PV Drivers → Guest OS

# HVM Architecture
Host Hardware → Hypervisor → Virtualized Hardware → Guest OS

Performance varies significantly between the two types:

Metric PV HVM
CPU Performance Higher (direct hypercalls) Lower (hardware emulation)
I/O Performance Depends on PV drivers Better with EBS-optimized
Boot Time Faster Slower

Here's how to specify virtualization type when launching instances:


# AWS CLI example for PV
aws ec2 run-instances \
    --image-id ami-12345678 \
    --instance-type m1.small \
    --virtualization-type paravirtual

# AWS CLI example for HVM
aws ec2 run-instances \
    --image-id ami-87654321 \
    --instance-type t2.micro \
    --virtualization-type hvm

Current best practices suggest:

  • Use HVM for most workloads (better hardware support)
  • PV may be preferable for legacy applications
  • Always check instance type compatibility

Watch for these virtualization-specific problems:


# Check virtualization type of running instance
aws ec2 describe-instances \
    --instance-ids i-1234567890abcdef0 \
    --query 'Reservations[].Instances[].VirtualizationType'

Remember that some newer instance types (like t3) only support HVM.