Security Through Obscurity: Does Changing Default Port Numbers Actually Protect Your Private Services?


2 views

As someone who's managed enterprise networks and hardened Linux servers, I've witnessed countless teams obsess over port changes while neglecting fundamental security practices. Let's examine whether this common recommendation holds technical merit.

Modern scanning tools don't rely on guessing default ports. Consider this Nmap command that would find MySQL regardless of port:

nmap -sV -p 1-65535 --open -script mysql-info target_ip

Shodan and other IoT search engines maintain extensive service fingerprints that identify applications through:

  • Banner grabbing
  • Protocol handshake patterns
  • Behavioral analysis

There are specific scenarios where non-standard ports provide value:

Scenario Example Effectiveness
Log reduction Moving SSH from 22 to 49281 High (reduces automated brute force attempts)
Internal services Database on non-standard port Medium (defense in depth for internal networks)

Instead of focusing on ports, implement these concrete measures:

# SSH hardening example
Port 22
PermitRootLogin no
MaxAuthTries 3
PasswordAuthentication no
AllowUsers specific_admin

For web applications, consider these HTTP headers:

Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains
X-Frame-Options: DENY
Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'

Based on my penetration testing experience:

  • Changed ports alone stopped 0% of targeted attacks
  • Proper authentication stopped 78%
  • Network segmentation stopped 92%

If you do change ports, do it properly:

# iptables example redirecting web traffic
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 8080 -j REDIRECT --to-port 80
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 8080 -j ACCEPT

Combine with other security measures like:

# Fail2ban configuration for SSH
[sshd]
enabled = true
port = 49281
filter = sshd
logpath = /var/log/auth.log
maxretry = 3

Many system administrators and developers argue that changing default ports (like moving SSH from 22 to 2222 or MySQL from 3306 to 33060) provides a security layer. While this falls under "security through obscurity," it's not entirely without merit.


# Common port changes in configuration files
# SSH (sshd_config):
Port 22222

# MySQL (my.cnf):
[mysqld]
port=33060

Changing ports can be effective against:

  • Automated bots scanning for default ports
  • Script kiddies running basic scans
  • Reducing noise in server logs from random scans

Port scanning tools like nmap can easily discover open ports regardless of their numbers:


# Basic nmap scan that would find any open ports
nmap -p- [target_ip]

# More aggressive version with service detection
nmap -sV -T4 -p- [target_ip]

Instead of relying solely on port changes, consider implementing:


# Example iptables rules for SSH protection
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22222 -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m recent --set
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22222 -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m recent --update --seconds 60 --hitcount 4 -j DROP

# Fail2ban configuration for SSH
[sshd]
enabled = true
port = 22222
filter = sshd
logpath = /var/log/auth.log
maxretry = 3

For maximum security, combine port changes with:

  • Proper firewall rules (rate limiting, geo-blocking)
  • Intrusion detection systems
  • Strong authentication methods
  • Regular security patching

Using non-standard ports may affect:

  • Network troubleshooting (administrators may overlook non-standard ports)
  • Application compatibility (some hardcoded clients may fail)
  • Firewall rule complexity