Battery-Backed Write Cache (BBWC) is a critical hardware component in enterprise servers that combines volatile RAM cache with battery power to maintain data integrity during outages. Unlike standard write caches that lose data when power fails, BBWC preserves cached writes until power resumes.
While BBWC is most commonly associated with RAID controllers (like PERC H740P or MegaRAID 9460-16i), its benefits extend to any storage subsystem requiring write acceleration. Example RAID controller initialization with BBWC enabled:
# MegaCLI command example
MegaCli -LDSetProp WB -LAll -aAll
MegaCli -LDSetProp CachedBadBBU -LAll -aAll
The battery typically provides 72+ hours of backup power. When the system detects power loss:
- Immediately flushes cache to non-volatile storage
- Maintains cache contents in DRAM via battery
- Automatically completes writes when power returns
For sequential workloads (common in database servers and media processing):
Operation | Without BBWC | With BBWC |
---|---|---|
Sequential Write | 450 MB/s | 650 MB/s |
Random Write | 120 MB/s | 380 MB/s |
When evaluating BBWC options:
- Battery lifespan (typically 3-5 years)
- Cache size vs workload requirements
- Monitoring requirements (SNMP traps for battery health)
Sample battery health check script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check BBU status on MegaRAID
status=$(storcli /c0 show all | grep "BBU Status")
if [[ $status != *"Optimal"* ]]; then
echo "ALERT: BBU needs replacement" | mail -s "BBU Alert" admin@example.com
fi
For cloud-native implementations where physical BBWC isn't available:
// AWS EBS optimization with write acceleration
resource "aws_ebs_volume" "example" {
type = "io2"
iops = 64000
size = 1000
throughput = 1000
encrypted = true
availability_zone = "us-west-2a"
}
Battery-Backed Write Cache (BBWC) is a specialized hardware component that serves as non-volatile RAM (NVRAM) for storage controllers. When your server performs write operations, data first goes to this cache before being permanently written to disks. The battery backup ensures data persistence even during power failures.
// Pseudo-code demonstrating BBWC write flow
function handleWriteRequest(data) {
// Step 1: Write to BBWC first
bbwc.write(data);
// Step 2: Acknowledge write completion to OS
sendAckToOS();
// Step 3: Asynchronously flush to disk
diskController.flushToDisk(data);
}
While BBWC is commonly associated with RAID controllers (especially in hardware RAID configurations), its utility extends to:
- Standalone storage controllers
- Hybrid storage solutions
- Certain NVMe controller implementations
The battery maintains power long enough to:
- Complete pending write operations
- Preserve cache contents until power restoration
- Enable graceful recovery when the server reboots
// Example power failure handler
void powerFailureHandler() {
if (bbwc.hasPendingWrites()) {
bbwc.emergencyFlush();
logRecoveryMetadata();
}
enterSafeShutdown();
}
For sequential operations, BBWC provides:
Operation | Without BBWC | With BBWC |
---|---|---|
Sequential Read | No difference | No difference |
Sequential Write | Disk speed limited | RAM speed for initial write |
Mixed Workloads | Significant latency | Consistent performance |
Key factors in BBWC adoption:
- Workload Characteristics: Transaction-heavy systems benefit most
- Cost-Benefit Analysis: Premium for BBWC vs potential downtime costs
- Alternative Solutions: SSDs with capacitors vs traditional BBWC
Sample Linux commands to verify BBWC status:
# Check BBWC battery health
megacli -AdpBbuCmd -GetBbuStatus -aALL
# View cache policy settings
megacli -LDGetProp -Cache -LALL -aALL
# Force cache flush (testing purposes)
echo "1" > /sys/block/sdX/device/cache_type
Benchmark results from a database server:
| Metric | BBWC Disabled | BBWC Enabled | |-----------------|---------------|--------------| | Avg. Write Latency | 8.2ms | 0.5ms | | 99th %ile Latency | 23ms | 2.1ms | | Throughput | 12K IOPS | 48K IOPS |