When working with Java applications on Windows Server, you'll encounter two primary executable variants:
java.exe // Runs with a console window
javaw.exe // Runs without a console window
The fundamental difference lies in how these executables handle the console window:
- java.exe: Allocates a console window for standard I/O operations (System.out, System.err)
- javaw.exe: Designed specifically for GUI applications, doesn't create console window
Consider these common use cases:
// Running a server application that logs to file
javaw.exe -jar myServerApp.jar
// Running a console-based utility
java.exe -jar consoleTool.jar
Key behavioral characteristics:
Feature | java.exe | javaw.exe |
---|---|---|
Console Window | Visible | Hidden |
Standard I/O | Available | Redirected to parent process |
Process Tree | Appears with console | Appears as standalone process |
For Windows Server deployments:
- Use
javaw.exe
for:- Background services
- GUI applications
- When console output isn't needed
- Use
java.exe
for:- Command-line tools
- When you need to see console output
- Debugging purposes
Here's how you might implement a service wrapper:
@echo off
REM Choose the appropriate launcher based on requirements
if "%1" == "console" (
java.exe -Xmx1024m -jar MyService.jar
) else (
javaw.exe -Xmx1024m -jar MyService.jar
)
Common issues and solutions:
- Missing console output: Switch from javaw to java for debugging
- Unexpected process termination: Check if parent process terminates javaw instance
- Memory settings: Both executables accept same JVM arguments
Both java.exe
and javaw.exe
are Java application launchers included in the Java Development Kit (JDK), but they serve different purposes in Windows environments:
- java.exe: Launches Java applications with a visible console window and standard I/O streams
- javaw.exe: Launches Java applications without a console window (the "w" stands for "windowless")
Here's when to choose each launcher:
// For command-line applications needing console interaction:
java.exe -jar MyConsoleApp.jar
// For GUI applications or background services:
javaw.exe -jar MySwingApp.jar
The choice between them affects several aspects:
Aspect | java.exe | javaw.exe |
---|---|---|
Console Window | Visible | Hidden |
System Tray Icon | Creates Java icon | No icon by default |
Error Output | Shows in console | Requires logging |
When running multiple instances:
// java.exe creates distinct console windows for each instance
start java.exe -jar App1.jar
start java.exe -jar App2.jar
// javaw.exe runs quietly in background
start javaw.exe -jar Service1.jar
start javaw.exe -jar Service2.jar
For development, java.exe
is generally better because:
- Immediate visibility of System.out/err
- Easier to terminate (Ctrl+C in console)
- Stack traces appear directly in console
For production GUI apps, javaw.exe
is preferable to avoid:
// This would create an unnecessary console for a Swing app
java.exe -jar MyGUIApp.jar
On Windows Servers, consider these factors:
- Use
javaw.exe
for Windows services (via wrapper tools) java.exe
is better for batch processing with logging- Memory usage is identical between both